Evidence That It Works
Researchers compared two different approaches to diversity with 60 fourth and fifth graders at a public school in the United States (51 White, 9 Asian). One approach cultivated a value diversity mindset (e.g., “That means we need to recognize how we are different from our neighbors and appreciate those differences,” “We want to show everyone that race is important because our racial differences make each of us special”). The other approach minimized an awareness of distinct identities (e.g., “That means that we need to focus on how we are similar to our neighbors rather than how we are different,” “We want to show everyone that race is not important and that we’re all the same”).
The results? Students in the value diversity mindset group were better able to recognize both clear instances as well as ambiguous instances of discrimination as compared to students in the group that minimized distinct identities. What’s more, students in the group that minimized distinct identities less often described overt instances of discrimination events in a way that would lead a teacher to intervene. The researchers explain that these findings suggest that an approach to diversity that does not nurture its value can contribute to underreporting of injustices and permit clear instances of bias based on cultural and social identity to persist.
Why Does It Matter?
Researchers have identified valuing diversity as one of seven primary indicators of teen well-being. Valuing diversity is a marker of adolescent thriving because teens who care about and feel a sense of responsibility to people beyond themselves can contribute to efforts that are useful to all of society. What’s more, teens who value diversity tend to place a high value on equality and justice, like acting to reduce hunger and poverty.
Interacting in a group with people of different cultural and social identities can bring up challenges around communication and belonging. But research also finds that groups that value both the differences in cultural and social identities within the group as well as share a broader team identity are more creative. What’s more, diverse groups tend to engage in greater responsible decision-making.
References
Apfelbaum, E. P., Pauker, K., Sommers, S. R., & Ambady, N. (2010). In blind pursuit of racial equality? Psychological Science, 21(11), 1587–1592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384741
Salazar, M. R., Feitosa, J., & Salas, E. (2017). Diversity and team creativity: Exploring underlying mechanisms. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 21(4), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000073
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_3
Sommers, S. R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597
Comments