Contemplative Reading
This practice, inspired by the lectio divina method, asks students to read a text slowly and carefully and then reflect on it, helping to cultivate deeper awareness and understanding.
This practice, inspired by the lectio divina method, asks students to read a text slowly and carefully and then reflect on it, helping to cultivate deeper awareness and understanding.
Students will:
Select an appropriate text or poem and experience it yourself through slow reading. How does reading a text this way make you feel? Does your relationship to the text change as a result of this method?
Leave some time at the end of the session to allow students to reflect on their experience. How did this process feel? What did they discover about themselves? Did it change how they felt about the text or reading in general?
The Center for Contemplative Mind in Society (CMind) transforms higher education through contemplative practice. Founded in 1997, CMind organizes conferences, retreats, and the annual Summer Session on Contemplative Learning in Higher Education; creates and identifies useful resources; and connects a global, multidisciplinary community of educators through our primary initiative, the Association for Contemplative Mind in Higher Education. See http://contemplativemind.org for more information.
What ideas, questions, and new topics to explore arose from students’ responses? How does this practice affect students’ appreciation or understanding of the topic being studied? Did this practice impact the classroom as a community?
A recent study focused on university students who took a course that used contemplative pedagogy, including a form of lectio divina, as they read young adult literature. Results suggest that students who used this contemplative reading practice gained a deeper insight into themselves and the content, and also regained their passion for reading and writing.
The “outside-in” approach to education doesn’t always connect academic content to students’ lives and often leaves students questioning the meaning of what they’re learning. This approach can eventually lead to decreased student motivation and well-being. Indeed, studies have found that students who set personal goals and take time to think about the person they want to become enjoy greater academic success and engage in less risky behavior.
Motivated by both their personal experience and their observation of students over the years, the professors who designed the course above challenged the “outside-in” approach. Instead of asking students to deconstruct texts, they invited students to “enjoy them and engage with them in a way that helps them construct meaning for themselves as they ask: who am I, why am I here, and why should I care?”
The outcome? As one student wrote at the end of class: “What I loved about this class was that it was more than the typical ‘academic’ class: I learned more about myself, my beliefs, and how to think than in any other class. The irony lies in the fact that I had no idea I even needed to learn any of these things.”
Do you want to dive deeper into the science behind our GGIE practices? Enroll in one of our online courses for educators!
Comments