Contemplative Writing
This variation on freewriting is a method of inner inquiry, helping students to explore their thoughts, emotions, or ideas on a topic of their choice, an academic-related question, or an ethical dilemma.
This variation on freewriting is a method of inner inquiry, helping students to explore their thoughts, emotions, or ideas on a topic of their choice, an academic-related question, or an ethical dilemma.
Students will:
Practice the method with your own question. Set your intention to write freely and without self-criticism or judgment. Don’t worry about trying to be correct or clever; allow yourself to just see what happens. How did this process make you feel afterwards? What insights did you gain through this process?
This practice may be used with a prompt related to a topic being studied, an ethical dilemma, or with a question generated by students themselves. The focus is on process, not outcome. Assure students that their writing will not be shared unless they choose to do so. Provide as much personal space as possible for students to have privacy, including writing outdoors (weather permitting).
The Center for Contemplative Mind in Society (CMind) transforms higher education through contemplative practice. Founded in 1997, we organize conferences, retreats, and the annual Summer Session on Contemplative Learning in Higher Education; we create and identify useful resources; and we connect a global, multidisciplinary community of educators through our primary initiative, the Association for Contemplative Mind in Higher Education.
Did the students enjoy this practice? What is their feedback about any insights they received? Do you notice whether students take a different approach to writing afterwards?
Several studies have found that free-writing—or writing without stopping—improves college students’ comprehension of lecture material and increases their confidence in academic writing. One study with 200 mainly Dutch 7th graders found that those who wrote freely about their values experienced more prosocial feelings such as love and connectedness and exhibited more prosocial behavior over a three-month period than students in a control group.
Education is often conducted as an “outside-in” process: the student is an empty vessel to be filled with facts, figures, and ideas that are supported by outside sources. While this method has its place, it ignores a student’s own wisdom and life experience as it relates to the content. As a result, students often leave school not knowing who they are, what they value, and how to approach life’s many dilemmas.
By offering students the opportunity to gain insight into their own thinking, values, and problem-solving abilities, educators are not only helping to deepen students’ learning of content and making it more meaningful, they are also guiding students in the key developmental task of youth: Answering the questions “who do I want to become” and “what strengths can I offer in service of the greater good?”
Do you want to dive deeper into the science behind our GGIE practices? Enroll in one of our online courses for educators!
Comments